Energy security has long been discussed in terms of reserves, production capacity and pricing models. However, the recent tension observed in the Somalia – Red Sea corridor reminds us once again that the center of gravity in the energy architecture has shifted from underground to the seas. The rhythm of energy flows is no longer defined by the wells, but by the vulnerability of the corridors.

Africa holds 30% of the world’s critical minerals. China’s infrastructure dominance, the Gulf’s expanding capital reach, Western concerns over supply chain security, and Türkiye’s growing diplomatic presence are all placing the continent at the critical intersection of energy, technology, and financial policy. But today, the question is not who extracts them It is where they are processed and who controls the chain.

Renewable Yet Fragile: Is Europe’s Wind Power in China’s Hands? The European Union aims to quadruple its offshore wind capacity by 2030. At the core of this goal lies a critical question. Who controls the supply chain behind this transformation? China’s influence, stretching from wind turbines to rare earth elements, is quietly shaping Europe’s energy transition into a new form of dependency. While moving away from fossil fuels, is Europe entering a phase of technological re

In an era where the energy transition is accelerating, why are new natural gas fields still being discovered? Kuwait’s major offshore gas discovery announced in October 2025 is not merely an energy headline. This move strengthens China’s strategic supply chain, puts pressure on Europe’s fragile supply architecture, creates alternatives to Russia’s energy influence, and places Turkey in a new position between technical capacity and diplomatic outreach.

Energy, data, security, infrastructure, and invisible agreements. From a $350 billion deadlock to North Korean missiles, from the collapse of multilateralism to the new geopolitics of green transition… This year’s APEC Summit, hosted by South Korea, was not just a meeting. It was the cipher of a changing era. No decisions were made, but a direction was given.

The United Kingdom has reduced its offshore wind budget. Investors are cautious, supply chains remain fragile, and costs continue to rise. This picture is not only financial; it also delivers a strategic message. Europe is no longer asking how many turbines it can build, but whose turbines they are. The energy transition is accelerating, yet sovereignty is quietly shifting hands.

Europe is accelerating its energy transition, but the sound of the turbines no longer belongs to its own wind. Each offshore turbine connects the continent a little more to China’s industrial network. Today, energy sovereignty is no longer measured by reserves but by who holds control of the infrastructure chain. As the green transition deepens, technological dependence quietly grows. Europe is trying to manage the transition, but who manages the infrastructure of that transi

The European Union has banned the import of Russian liquefied natural gas (LNG) as part of its 19th sanctions package. The Union’s priorities are now clear: energy security, strategic autonomy, and geopolitical resilience. This decision reshapes not only Europe’s energy supply, but also its foreign policy direction, economic independence, and climate strategy.

Berlin’s approval of gas production in the Wadden Sea has quietly reignited the debate over the limits of idealism in European energy policy. The decision illustrates how the fine line between energy security and climate commitments is being redefined across the continent. The question is no longer “Which energy source?” It is “At what speed, at what cost, and under what security framework?”

Shell has announced a new 2 billion dollar gas investment off the coast of Nigeria. This decision is not only commercial but also a move that redefines the geoeconomic weight of gas in the energy transition. While the West advocates for “decarbonization,” Africa emphasizes its “right to development.” This debate brings the fair and realistic limits of the energy transition back into focus.

Europe’s New Weapon: Carbon Set to take effect in 2026, the CBAM is far more than an environmental policy. This time, Brussels’ objective is not merely climate action but a complete rewriting of the rules of global competition. With the new support package, Omnibus I regulations and global carbon pricing initiatives, CBAM is no longer a “tax.” It has evolved into a geo-economic strategy.

Australia’s decision to delay the planned closure of its coal-fired power plants signals a new direction in its energy policy. This move brings back the debate between idealism and practicality in the global energy transition. Energy security is no longer defined solely by diversification, but by infrastructure stability and financial resilience. The Australian case reminds us that the success of the transition depends not on speed, but on how sustainably it is managed.

China is no longer just an energy producer but the architect of energy technologies. By establishing global dominance in solar, wind, and battery production, it is shifting energy dependency from resources to technology. This new order is reshaping energy diplomacy. The question is no longer “Who controls the resources?” but “Who commands the technology?”

Norwegian energy major Equinor has suspended the electrification of its offshore platforms due to soaring costs. This decision signals a quiet yet profound rupture in Europe’s vision of the “green transition.” The energy transition is no longer merely an environmental goal; it has become a test of financial resilience. The Equinor case reminds us that sustainability in energy is only achievable through sustainable investment models.

France’s Energia acquisition marks a new era in which energy diplomacy is no longer defined by production or supply, but by the interplay of data, algorithms, and electricity. As AI-driven infrastructures reshape global electricity demand, France emerges as one of the first actors to institutionalize digital energy sovereignty. According to SAVYNOR, “Electricity has become the new diplomatic currency.”

The intervention against humanitarian vessels in international waters is no longer merely a crisis; it is a global rupture where law and conscience are being tested at sea. Global Sumud has become the symbol of an era in which the shared values of humanity are put to the test.

The drone attacks in Denmark and the French navy’s interception of the Boracay tanker at the end of September revealed that grey-zone warfare at sea has entered a new phase. Shadow fleets are no longer limited to sanction evasion; they are increasingly emerging as the logistical arm of hybrid operations. For NATO navies, the real challenge lies not in visible ships but in invisible, unaccountable, and hybridized actors.

The obstruction of the Global Sumud Flotilla targeted the right to life of civilians under blockade, disregarded maritime security principles, suspended the rule of law, and threatened the global order. This incident is not only shaking the balance of security and law in the seas beyond the Eastern Mediterranean; it also reveals the crisis of the international system itself, marking a serious breaking point.

Civilian-looking ferries are no longer just for trade. According to U.S. intelligence reports, China’s expanding RoRo fleet has been designed to carry tanks and troops when needed. These vessels could serve as the silent backbone of an amphibious operation or a maritime blockade. For Taiwan’s energy security and the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific, this marks a critical turning point.

The invisible backbone of offshore energy lies in subsea cables. They are not only a technical component but also a new frontier in security, environment and diplomacy. The global energy transition is shaped not only by turbines but also by the silent cables stretching across the seabed. Our detailed analysis explores these dimensions in depth.