The nuclear cooperation memorandum signed between Turkey and the United States is not merely a technical step in the field of energy; it is also a sign of Ankara’s effort to redefine its position on the global chessboard. While the agreement carries certain risks, if managed effectively it holds the potential to make Turkey more independent in energy security and a more central actor in the geopolitical dynamics of a multipolar system.

Is hydrogen, often hailed as the “green gold” truly the key to the energy transition or just an expensive illusion? IEA data shows that most projects remain stuck on paper. So how will hydrogen’s future be shaped amid financial realities, technical barriers, and geopolitical tensions?

Offshore energy is no longer a luxury. It has become a strategic necessity on a global scale. From Taiwan to Scotland, from the United States to Denmark, new projects are emerging. Investment decisions by Equinor and Ørsted, alongside advancements in hydrogen and floating wind technologies, highlight that we are at a critical juncture not only for energy security but also for financial stability and investor confidence.

The International Energy Agency (IEA)’s September 2025 report indicates a rising risk of oil oversupply for 2025 and 2026. This is not merely a supply issue; energy security, financial diplomacy, and geopolitical strategies are now being rewritten. The new balance in energy will not be shaped by the supply-demand line alone, It will be built through visions capable of going beyond that line.

As Russia pulls out of the European market, its newly built energy bridge with China is reshaping the global balance of power. The Power of Siberia 2 project is not just an energy move; it marks a multilayered transformation spanning supply chains, land–sea logistics, geopolitical alignments, and financial infrastructures. Financial instruments such as Panda Bonds are also stepping in, establishing a new partnership framework through energy-finance integration.

Beijing 2025: China’s Rise in the New Era or a Show of Force? The military parade held on September 3, 2025, was not merely a commemorative event; it served as a symbolic showcase of China’s vision for a redefined global order. From AI-powered defense systems to the nuclear triad, and from advanced weaponry to the emblematic triangle of leaders that now symbolizes multipolar geopolitics, numerous elements were staged with remarkable emphasis.

From BRI to the Middle Corridor: Turkey in the New Balance Map of Multipolarity The Shanghai 2025 Summit was not merely a diplomatic gathering. It was a critical turning point that reflected the multilayered transformation of the global system. Our article explores all dimensions of the Shanghai 2025 Summit, analyzing its strategic turning points from multipolar energy diplomacy to digital diplomatic infrastructures.

Is the U.S. seeking permanent ownership of bases in South Korea? A proposal reportedly raised by the Trump administration could reshape the architecture of the U.S.–South Korea alliance and profoundly impact strategic balances in the Asia-Pacific. Although it has not yet entered formal negotiations, the mere introduction of such a demand holds critical importance in terms of sovereignty, defense autonomy, and geopolitical orientation.

Is Russia reopening the door to Western investors through Sakhalin-1? As a new balance emerges in energy diplomacy, we explored the geopolitical impact of this strategic move.